Saturday, 28 January 2017



'T2: TRAINSPOTTING' - REVIEW

Release Date: Friday the 27th of January (UK Release)
Directed By: Danny Boyle
Written By: John Hodge and Irvine Welsh (Original Material)
Produced By: Bernard Bellew, Danny Boyle, Christian Colson and Andrew Macdonald
Starring: Ewan McGregor, Robert Carlyle, Johnny Lee Miller and Ewen Bremner.
Distributed By: Tristar Pictures




“20 years has just flown by eh?” asks a rhetorical Spud with the ever present innocence that the remaining cast certainly lack. A statement which will vary very much depending on the audience who in turn will either relate entirely or in fact feel the opposite. A film which has gone on to sit at the very high end of cult classic status, Danny Boyle’s most iconic feature released in 1996 has been on the viewing list of many generations and still stands as one of that decades most seminal films. With that in mind, palms obtained an abundance of perspiration at the announcement of a sequel with the original cast set twenty years after the original. With Irvine Welsh’s sequel novel ‘Porno’ to be the groundwork for the follow up, speculation was rife with a shimmering and collective sense of hope.

After walking out on his three friends and a life of a heroin addict, Mark Renton is now a married man in Amsterdam with a new addiction, running. Returning to Edinburgh to track down his old friend Sick Boy (Lee Miller) and of course his old partner in crime Spud (Bremner). Attempting to settle old quarrels, Renton is soon given an opportunity to find meaning in his life with a business proposition from Sick Boy. In the background however is the ever imposing and terrifying Francis Begbie (Carlyle) recently released and out for vengeance. 

The instantaneous realisation from the opening sequence is that even after all this time, Boyle’s knack for finding the bond between image and sound is more prevalent than ever and is something which made the first instalment all the more captivating. Here beats and rhythms are crafted to find the tonal sweet spot beautifully, be that in a light hearted running sequence or a foreboding chase in in an underground car park. The mix of swift cuts and lavish slow motion again show that the spark of Boyle’s ingenious visual creativity burns bright as we are treated to a range of sequences reflecting the rundown areas of Scotland, with truly fantastical sequences as iconic as Renton’s engulfment into the carpet back in 96. 


Working with regular cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle, Boyle creates a plethora of visual stimuli which tap into the heart of what T2 strives to be about, memory, regret and a desire to go back and do things differently, its here that the film finds it’s purpose and in some cases it’s primary audience, those who experienced the original at its release and were the same age. Its a film that provokes internal questions. What have you done with your life? Would you change what you did? Any regrets? Going against the grain of most sequels, Boyle chooses to utilise the 20 year gap as the core of the narrative, fuelling the themes of the simple passage of time as a sobering inevitability. With a questionable amount of flashbacks to the first instalment,these serve to contextualise the passage of time and unify the audience into the same characters but as part of an entirely different film to its predecessor.

It’s here the biggest punches are made emotionally as we see that whilst Renton has had a somewhat easier ride (Not without its drawbacks) Simon, Spud and Francis have all had it much rougher with Spud still hooked on the skag and seemingly in a never-ending circle of disappointment and isolation what with crippling mental issues and his relationship with old flame Gail (Shirley Henderson) and son on the rocks. From this introduction, this is where Spud almost takes primary focus throughout the story as we see his character grow from past loveable idiot to a driven and emotionally unstable junkie determined to kick the habit and make a fresh start. Simon, the once cocksure and charmer of the group has now been reduced to a blackmailing scheme with girlfriend Veronica (A likeable and engaging performance by Anjela Nedyalkova) and running a rundown pub. Begbie in an unsurprising turn of events is of course behind bars with nothing but revenge on his mind. 


With regards to performances, the love from all the old players bleeds through each scene as though 20 years have indeed flown by in the blink of an eye, both McGregor and Lee Miller slipping back into the roles which made their careers with effortless vigour, Sick boy’s penchant for moral elasticity ever present and guiltily enjoyable to watch, whilst Renton’s return is a much more sombre and almost wistful take on a man at something of an impasse in his life. The highlight however is as predicted, Carlyle’s menacing presence as Francis Begbie, his introductory scene a wonderfully comic take on a violent man being denied what he wants, freedom. With Carlyle walking the fine line between caricature and overt severity, each scene is it’s own shot in the arm for one of his iconic characters. Despite this, even he is not exempt from deeper emotional underpinning in the form of his wife and son who ground the once unstoppable Begbie as a father with important choices to make. 

As much a star of the film as its cast and style however, is the writing of John Hodge who has crafted a wonderfully fitting and enthralling path for these characters. With Welsh’s ‘Porno’ not given the full adaptation and instead taken from lightly, space is made to accommodate and make use of the abundance of themes and messages found in almost every scene, not to mention a slew of sharp dialogue, darkly poignant sequences and an edge of development for the main four. 


This leads to one of the unfortunate, though not devastating drawbacks of the film. Whilst the majority of the cast feel well fleshed out and investable, there’s a sense of disappointment in the representation of old faces Diane (Kelly MacDonald) and Gail with Diane only given one scene which whilst enjoyable to see, lacks any sense of chemistry there was in the original. Whilst Gail gains marginally more screen time, her role feels a touch like a missed opportunity. 

With the soundtrack being as iconic as the film itself, certain call backs are made within the song choices which work to tease the sense nostalgia without saturating the film entirely and whilst there are a few songs which serve to bring the story into the 21st century, there isn't a palpable sense of heart pounding fun and snapshot of the era which made for one of the best soundtracks of the 90’s. 

As a 20 year old, my views will of course not represent those of a forty something who saw it in their prime though that said, perhaps thats the beauty of Boyle’s latest in that the variety of feelings to be extracted from each viewer demonstrates the raw emotion both behind and in front of the camera and the universal themes it carries to it’s core. Its a film with heart, soul and a conscience, still maintaining the sense of uncertainty and apprehension humanity carries in its everyday life. 

If there was ever any trepidation before the release of this film, all has faded as Boyle has most certainly pulled it out of the bag with a film which serves to brush away the dust and lay bare the issues of age, betrayal, friendship, fear, hatred and love in a sequel which respects it’s past and is aware of what skepticism may be found and chooses to be about the wider concept of nostalgia, rather than a heartless follow up. Its a film which isn't trying to be as good as it’s original, making it all the more emotive and at times breathtaking. 


"You were an addict, so be addicted, just be addicted to something else" - Mark Renton






Wednesday, 18 January 2017


'MANCHESTER BY THE SEA' - REVIEW


Release Date: Friday the 13th of January (UK Release)
Directed By: Kenneth Lonergan
Written By: Kenneth Lonergan
Produced By Matt Damon, John Krasinski and Kimberly Steward
Starring: Casey Affleck, Lucas Hedges, Kyle Chandler, Michelle Williams and C.J Wilson
Distributed By: Roadside Attractions and Amazon Studios





It’s rare nowadays in the age of saturated superhero smackdowns, faded franchise fodder and hollow, hollywood horror to even think of a film actually making you feel something beyond a sharp intake of breathe when the speakers are turned up to eleven. With Kenneth Lonergan’s ‘Manchester By the Sea’, getting up out of the seat kicked me back into the real world and away from the intense two and a quarter hours I had just experienced. 

Set in the titular town, the story follows Lee Chandler (Affleck) as he is made to move away from his menial janitorial work in Boston to look after his nephew Patrick (Hedges) after his brother Joe (Chandler) passes away. At first uneasy at being back in his hometown, Lee must let go of his past demons in order to become not only a better guardian and uncle, but also a better man for it. 

As is common around this time of year, a lot of the films considered for awards contention carry with them hefty themes of guilt, tragedy and the cost of a conscience. Whilst Lonergan’s third feature is no exception, what sets it aside from the usual ‘Oscar Bait’ its its sense of blistering realness contained within every scene that really makes this piece fly  well above the likes of a feature starring an almost forgotten actor plying for a renaissance.  

At the heart of this study of isolation and repression is Casey Affleck’s Lee. Whilst an actor who has never put in a poor performance, it is clear that here the distinct subtlety and physical ticks performed make for a truly powerhouse performance which stands as something of a masterclass in physical acting and will surely be a performance aspiring actors will wish to study in the future. When we are introduced to Lee, his repetitively demeaning life as a janitor is made abundantly clear as well as his lack of communication to the numerous tenants, a man reduced to picking fights in bars, usually never winning and almost just existing. Come the second and third act however, Affleck’s subtlety’s are perfectly understood and empathised with completely as his deeply troubled past is highlighted and plays out in a serious of juxtaposing flashbacks working to great effect. As the timeline progresses both back and forth where necessary, Affleck’s Lee displays great range in almost all areas, displaying roguish charm, unimaginable lament and eventual sobering heartbreak. Destined for Best Actor nominations across the board (if not wins), Affleck’s incredibly focused and almost pity extracting performance of a broken man striving to find something in the place harbouring so much heartache.

Whilst this is very much Affleck’s film through and through, that is not to say the supporting performances are lacklustre, very much the opposite if anything forming a ring of the strongest casts since the likes of Todd McCarthy’s ‘Spotlight’. Whilst the marketing for the film may present this as a love story between Lee and his ex wife Randi (Williams), their dynamic is in retrospect, smattered in-between the primary narrative but still wonderfully realised with palpable chemistry supported by an equally strong performance by Michele Williams as the sometimes foul mouthed, but at times incredibly fragile soul. 

Praise is also due to Lucas Hedges’ Patrick, the reasoning for Lee’s necessary move who’s portrayal of a child who has lost their way making for numerous scenes which will find you laughing at the familiarity in one moment, to tear jerking vulnerability in the next. The dynamic made between Affleck and Hedges allows for sparkling moments of hilarity as the bond between Nephew and Uncle is laid in its various forms, indeed drawing Lee out of his previously sealed shell and extracting a sense of humanity to the damaged character. Also weaved throughout this brutally real narrative, are the underpinnings of dark comedy played at numerous points at unexpected moments, strengthening the sense of humanity. One particular moment being the reveal of a family learning of a medical trauma, in which real drama is highlighted with deadpan hilarity.

Adding to this is Jody Lee Lipes' stunning cinematography, in one sequence capturing the crisp chill of snowy Boston, the next the fresh spray of the North Atlantic. The varying shades of icy blue with gracefully natural shots of nature and the New England streets giving a real sense of the working class lifestyle and close knit communities synonymous with fishing villages and towns. 

Whilst the performances and visuals make for truly transfixing watching, there are moments of jarring drawbacks which are merely artistic choices yet still result in withdrawal from fully immersing the viewer in the scenes in particular. These choices are highlighted in musical cues and the length at which they are used in a particularly essential scene with Affleck at the helm. The runtime of the utilised score serves in unintentionally toning down Affleck’s performance in a scene in which pure silence may have served it better.


Minor gripe aside, ‘Manchester By the Sea’ serves as a new benchmark in physical acting as well as proving Casey Affleck to be in many ways more of a character actor than his bigger Batman brother who’s last three films have seen menial rewards in terms of acting. Beautifully shot, performed, written and scored, Lonergan has delivered a film which displays an awards worthy actor with the necessary omission of an angsty, shouty performance and an incredibly true and realistic interpretation of bereavement and isolation.


“If you’re going to freak out every time you see a frozen chicken, I think we should go to hospital.” - Lee

Saturday, 14 January 2017


'LA LA LAND' - REVIEW

Release Date: Thursday the 12th of January (UK Release)
Directed By: Damien Chazelle
Written By: Damien Chazelle 
Produced By: Fred Berger, Gary Gilbert and Jordan Horowitz
Starring: Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone 
Distributed By: Summit Entertainment



After wringing the hell out of his audience with his rhythmically intoxicating 2014 debut feature 'Whiplash', Damien Chazelle returns to bring us another tale of dreams and desires this time against the Los Angeles skyline. At only 31, Chazelle has already received multiple award nominations including the coveted Best Director Academy Award, already giving something of a benchmark for himself so early on. With ‘La La Land’ being released merely two years after his sharply paced and performed ‘Whiplash’, does this young gun with a knack for sharp storytelling deliver?

Set in the idyllic hills of Los Angeles, ‘La La Land’ see’s aspiring actress Mia (Stone) seemingly stuck in a rut with unrewarding auditions, meet piano playing Jazz enthusiast Sebastian (Gosling) who’s also down on his luck, moving from job to job with dreams of one day opening his own Jazz club. From here, inevitable love blossoms as the two’s passions and dreams take them on an emotional rollercoaster fraught with heartache and joy. 

With the Musical genre in something of a latent state in todays Hollywood, Chazelle’s third feature is very much so a throwback to the golden age of Hollywood musical thematically modernised for the 21st century. Whilst there are an abundance of high energy dance numbers paired with an equally infectious soundtrack, there isn’t a sense of forced introduction and instead allows the songs to flow naturally, making a nice change from the harping, out of the blue numbers of old. That said however, the spirit of the 50’s musical is very much alive throughout the picture with some of the most audaciously choreographed dance sequences put on screen. From the opening scene, an incredible feat of long take cinematography and exquisite choreography to the very first title on screen “FILMED IN CINEMASCOPE”, the sense of nostalgia is delightfully rife leading to a felling of being in very safe and capable hands as Chazelle has previously demonstrated. The notable references to 1950’s cinema in general is also a welcome delight with references to Hollywood classics such as ‘Casablanca’ and the ever notorious ‘Rebel Without a Cause’, the blending of retro and contemporary is blurred to perfection, making for a final film which is like things you may have seen before, but also very much a film you are unlikely to see again. 

What sets the film aside from its 1950’s counterparts hover is the depth within the narrative as we follow these two dreamers through thick and thin, with their relationship at the forefront of the lens, both Stone and Gosling are undeniably glorious and believable interpretations of young creatives with a passion and drive, the Hollywood dream has a tendency to scrape away from the human conscious. Indeed, the saturation of modern Hollywood is made present at various intervals in a particularly astounding scene involving one of Mia’s numerous auditions. Whilst the first act comes dangerously close to painting a picture of an almost unbearably sweet and saccharine relationship, the second and third reveal the hardships and costs of following your dreams, to an almost bittersweet degree yet fantastically realised. 

As with ‘Whiplash’, the crux of the emotion lay within the form of a two hander between Miles Teller’s driven young drummer Andrew Neiman and his militaristic tutor Fletcher portrayed by J.K Simmons. Here the formula is very much the same, with Gosling and Stone very much leading the film forward with their believable and at times animated performances. Gosling again following his laugh out loud performance in Shane Black’s ‘The Nice Guys’, brings forth a beautiful blend of heartfelt drama and comedic wit in every scene. Absent is any sense of 50’s machismo and here we are given an individual who’s passion for a dying genre is enough to make anyone who feels invested in a hopeless endeavour, invigorated and energised. A man initially sceptical to the idea of a relationship, eventually coaxed into romance by Emma Stone’s wonderfully nuanced portrayal of a girl who simply dares to dream of a life many dare not to. Her usual wit and physical acting out on fine form, along with drawing both laughs and tears in equal turn, it is clear that Stone brings in one of the most heartwarming and inspiring performances of the year.

With the soundtrack being as much a character of the film as it’s two leads, natural skepticism may prepare yourself for an abundance of celebratory style tunes about success in the Hollywood Hills. Such lies the sheer relief when discovering a deeply ranged and moving collection of songs which perfectly encapsulate the sensations of whirlwind romance and the willpower of dreamers. Enhanced with real life sets, superb dance routines performed by both Gosling and Stone, there is also an underlining of the sheer sense of wonder surrounding Hollywood itself, leading to a wonderfully created moment of tranquil love at Griffith Observatory. Composer Justin Hurwitz crafts numerous classics bringing to mind the likes of ‘Singin’ in The Rain’ destined to become an iconic soundtrack in years to come.

In a world which see’s the world crumbling in front of our eyes week by week, it’s wholeheartedly refreshing to find such a gem which will make you smile, laugh and perhaps even cry at a celebration of those who dare to dream in an ever competitive and incredibly cynical world. Those with aspirations to enter the creative industry in whatever form should leave the screening feeling on the highest of highs and a sense of possibility. With Chazelle seemingly showing no signs of slowing down, its clear he has more than established himself as the new blood Hollywood is in short supply of of late and with this only his third feature, it’s somewhat obvious we can expect exciting and groundbreaking films to follow. 


"People love what other people are passionate about" - Mia


Saturday, 7 January 2017

'SILENCE' - REVIEW

Release Date: Sunday the 1st of January (UK Release)
Directed By: Martin Scorsese
Written By: Jay Cocks and Martin Scorsese
Produced By: Martin Scorsese, Barbara De Fina and Irvin Winkler
Starring: Andrew Garfield, Adam Driver, Tadanobu Asano, Yosuke Kubozuka, Issey Ogata and Liam Neeson.
Distributed By: Paramount Pictures





A 30 year struggle of a man fighting to find meaning in his ultimate passion, and that's just the making of Scorsese's epic. A film which adds a real sense of patience to the term passion Project, 'Silence', based on Shūsaku Endō's novel of the same name tells the story of two Seventeenth Century Jesuit Priests Father Rodrigues (Garfield) and Father Garrpe (Driver) who head out to Japan in search of  their mentor Father Ferreira (Neeson). Turmoil and torture ensue as they face not only being the representatives of an outlawed faith in a somewhat hostile environment, but also their own belief and it's repercussions.

Despite being a filmmaker who always almost effortlessly engrosses them self in every picture, not since his 1973 feature 'Mean Streets has Scorsese's sheer love for a film bled through the screen. Dealing with the themes of faith and compassion, themes very much at the heart of his filmmaking what with initial desires to make a career as a Catholic Priest, Scorsese manages to give the subject matter severe heft and weight, a feat not to be sniffed at. Casual fans may claim this to be a large departure from the usual visual stimuli conjured up by one of the masters, closer inspection however would reward said fans with the likes of 'The Last Temptation of Christ' and 'Kundun', both examples of Scorsese's previous efforts which have faith at the forefront. 


With a premise which may pass as an 'Apocalypse Now' esque narrative, utilising a much steadier pace equating in a lengthy runtime, The Master manages to craft a severe sense of threat with both father's continually under threat from severely long drawn out torture should they be discovered by the Inquisitors, relentless representatives of Japan’s anti Christianity law.



Maintaining a somewhat abstract and highly sensitive subject matter, with regards to character there is risk of tarring one particular faith as the antagonistic course. The beauty of Silence lies within it’s unbiased perception of faith in its many forms. With Garrpe and Rodrigues, both physical and metaphorical figureheads of the Christian faith to the small villages of Japan, the conflict arrises with the introduction of the Inquisitors. Their very introduction, notably the opening image through a thick mist to reveal the removed heads of outlawed Christians, giving an instant sense of trepidation. The development of the proposed antagonists really kicks off during the second act with the introduction of Issei Ogata’s chief inquisitor, an old Samurai who as we go on reveals he has no true hatred for Christianity but is merely following the rules set in place for the good of his country. A further dimension is added with Tadanobu Asano’s interpreter who with every dialogue heavy scene with Rodrigues, becomes the devil on his shoulder, chipping away at his faith and playing on the sheer amount of suffering being caused

Scorsese goes further to enhance the inner turmoil of the father’s minds as we see sheer faith power the will of the numerous villagers to willingly hide the priests and in various, horrifying sequences, sacrifice themselves to the ruthless torture and excruciating death. Whilst the runtime may at first seem something of a mountain at 180 minutes, any anxiety is ebbed away as whilst the third act may overstay it’s welcome to a point, the investment in the characters is where Scorsese’s strength really shines. The primary perspective being that of Father Rodrigues, we follow him as his faith is tested at every turn, despite the unquestionable faith displayed at the beginning of his mission, through a deep interior journey, his unflinching faith is uprooted piece by piece. 

In terms of performance, there is not a weak character to be found with the previously mentioned Ogata and Asano fantastically understated and bringing a deep sense of humanity to the force attempting to stamp out the Christian faith. Both Driver and Neeson, much more in the support slot this time around again give incredibly strong performances, Driver’s Garrpe coming forth as a relentless if subtle force of a faith driven man, his final scene showing a method actor who is still on the up and up. Garfield however is in a league of his own and displaying a performance destined for awards chatter as he exudes intrigue and intense sorrow.

Alongside the wealth of strong performances and strong writing, this picture also see’s Scorsese reuniting with ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’ DP Rodrigo Pierto, resulting in some truly astonishing visuals from deep, mist saturated forests, to wide and blisteringly crisp beaches. The palette beautifully varied to encompass a range of natural aspects, displaying Scorsese's love and homage of Kurosawa, the symbolism is rife within every frame to envelop us deeper into the heart of Japanese culture. Shot entirely on 35 millimetre film (his first since 2010’s ‘Shutter Island’) Pierto paints a wonderfully tranquil painting of a Seventeenth Century Japan which is as much a character  of the narrative as the stellar cast.

A filmmaker still at the top of his game and the reason I chose to pursue a career in film, Scorsese has once again proven that even at 74 he can still bring something fresh and surprising to his already astounding back catalogue. Whilst it may not be his most high octane thrill ride of a film, here he displays his highest passion through his second highest passion, film. Having always made films on his own terms, his way with little to no studio interference, Scorsese’s integrity as well as his film is something very inspiring and needed as 2017 opens on what will be hopefully a very strong year, with ‘Silence’ leading the way with hopeful and much deserved accolades on the horizon. 


"The price for your glory is their suffering" - Inoue